Reviewers Responsibilities

Expert Evaluation: Reviewers are experts in their field and are expected to provide a thorough evaluation of the scientific quality of the submitted manuscript. They assess the validity of the research methodology and results, the relevance and originality of the paper, and its significance to the field.

Constructive Feedback: Reviewers provide constructive feedback to help the authors improve their work. This includes identifying any weaknesses or flaws, suggesting improvements, and recommending further experiments or analyses if necessary.

Fair and Unbiased Review: Reviewers must be fair and unbiased in their assessment. Their feedback should be objective and they should not allow their personal beliefs or biases to influence their review.

Confidentiality: Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of the review process. They should not discuss the manuscript with others or use any information from the manuscript for their own benefit.

Timeliness: Reviewers should complete their review within the specified timeframe. This helps to ensure a swift publication process, which is beneficial for both the authors and the scientific community.

Conflict of Interest: Reviewers should disclose any conflicts of interest to the editor. If they feel they cannot provide a fair review for any reason, they should recuse themselves from the review process.

Adherence to Journal Guidelines: Reviewers should be familiar with the journal’s guidelines and ensure that the manuscript complies with these guidelines.

Verification of Sources: Reviewers should check that all sources cited in the manuscript are accurate, relevant, and properly referenced.

Note: The role of a reviewer is crucial in maintaining the quality and integrity of the scientific literature. Their work ensures that the research published in the journal is valid, reliable, and contributes to the field.